I've been thinking this for awhile especially after seeing a documentary espousing that the entire Global Warming thing boiled out of a plan of Margaret Thatcher to break the UK Coal Miner unions. Therefore any "scientist" who could prove coal was bad, got given government grants to continue the research.
Still, the reduction of air pollution and a lessening of the reliance on fossil fuels is a good idea on many levels, for at some point in the future we're gonna run out of crude oil, and some of that gunk that's in the air is some nasty stuff.
I wonder if there's any research on the link between air pollution levels and rainfall, for doesn't rain need a certain type of airborne particulate to form? And if so, is too much of that type in the wrong region? Wouldn't help the rain fall dependent regions of the globe, if the rain's happening long before it should.
Still, the reduction of air pollution and a lessening of the reliance on fossil fuels is a good idea on many levels, for at some point in the future we're gonna run out of crude oil, and some of that gunk that's in the air is some nasty stuff.
I wonder if there's any research on the link between air pollution levels and rainfall, for doesn't rain need a certain type of airborne particulate to form? And if so, is too much of that type in the wrong region? Wouldn't help the rain fall dependent regions of the globe, if the rain's happening long before it should.