Epsilon Wrote:Frankly not sure if it's worth the time to go and find all the stuff - AGAIN - just to prove myself to someone who has decided to hold anything I say in contempt and not worth his time. Would you be convinced of anything?Logan Darklighter Wrote:I think what he's saying here is that he tried to investigate the matter via the normal accepted process and was blocked at every turn by his peers. As Climategate has proven, it's -their- data that is in question.Uh, no. Climategate proved nothing of the fact. If it did, perhaps you can point to where this proof is. Site your sources, the specific e-mails and so on with relevant quotes.
------------------
Epsilon
Tell you what - you're not going to believe anything I say. How about Berkeley professor Richard A. Muller? Here's a guy who believes what you believe. That global warming is real. And HE is disgusted with the "science" involved.
Is this guy liberal enough to be credible to you?
As for specific sources. How about you go do the damn research yourself? Here's the ENTIRE archive of emails and data from Climategate. Not a single thing taken out of context. Nothing held back. It's the entire archive of material that broke the scandal in the first place. Go for it.
Here's another resource. Doubt you'll care much for that one though.