I think you misunderstand me. Those aren't figures. They are ratios of undefined numbers. The percentages you've presented are ambiguous at best and downright misleading at worst. The include no details of what the actual incomes were. How wealthy the top 20% are compared to the bottom 20%....
Would it make sense to ask, if the poorest 20% kept getting poorer, more of them would fall out of the tax brackets and thus end up contributing even less of a percentage to the overall tax take, along with an increasing welfare burden?
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Would it make sense to ask, if the poorest 20% kept getting poorer, more of them would fall out of the tax brackets and thus end up contributing even less of a percentage to the overall tax take, along with an increasing welfare burden?
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?