You tried the wiki page? Located here (it's marked as out of date but it references stuff that's only a few months old. o_O )
I'm from "Future land".... a Peter Clark colum for iPolitics.ca dated 3 Feb. "Exporting the TPP Melting Pot: Americanizing Japan" Link
This article also popped up on my radar: memeburn 2/2/12: "If SOPA was an aircraft carrier, ACTA and TPP are nuclear submarines" Link
And this one of boingboing "Son-of-ACTA, the TPP, wants to legislate buffers" Link
But ....
There was this particular article on ar technica *long article name* that linked to a previous article on TPP here *link* which had a link to leaked relevant stuff that has a lot of people concerned.
Quote:
I'm from "Future land".... a Peter Clark colum for iPolitics.ca dated 3 Feb. "Exporting the TPP Melting Pot: Americanizing Japan" Link
This article also popped up on my radar: memeburn 2/2/12: "If SOPA was an aircraft carrier, ACTA and TPP are nuclear submarines" Link
And this one of boingboing "Son-of-ACTA, the TPP, wants to legislate buffers" Link
But ....
There was this particular article on ar technica *long article name* that linked to a previous article on TPP here *link* which had a link to leaked relevant stuff that has a lot of people concerned.
Quote:
Quote:TPP has been in the drafting stage for some time, but the US intellectual property chapter (PDF) only leaked yesterday. Canadian law professor Michael Geist calls it "everything [the US] wanted in ACTA but didn't get."I can't speak a work of Japanese, but those that can, and have been following the Twitter discussion of TPP claim that it can be summed up in three words: Do Not Want.