Bob Schroeck Wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2 ... ans-switch]Here's an interesting idea.I expect that a competent lawyer would argue that the system as described was intended by the person who set it up to make a statement after an order to not make such a statement was issued to the person.
If the system was modified to send alerts that the trigger condition had not been met every time this was confirmed, then that wouldn't apply - but those repeated alerts might be classified as spam and not forwarded. Of course, that depends on how the alerts are delivered to the recipients ...
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012