Quote:Rajvik wrote:
Questions
1: is there any legal Precedent to have the situation wait for practically a year to be resolved? I know of none and unless there is some legal reason for doing so i don't think they legally can put it off that long. Now they can hold the appointment up in committee and on the floor for the year, but that may cost them the election.
2: what reason do you have to think that its going to be Rubio or Bush and not Cruz or Trump. I mean yeah, they have the "establishment" vote, maybe, but the damn country is pissed at the establishment and this is leading to higher numbers showing up for Cruz and Trump.
For number one: I haven't heard of one either.
As for number two: Well, one or the other may very well win the GOP nomination, but the general election? A senator whose greatest achievement to date is to shut down the government. Therefore making him qualified to lead it. And let us not go into the other guy.
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell