Quote:Morganite wrote:What the Hill Republicans are salivating over is that Trump is not going to be interested in the day to day governing of the country. He'll just sign what's in front of him. Unintended consequences be dammed. What you are going to see the GOP attempt what they tried in Kansas and Louisiana.Quote:robkelk wrote:
Isn't "the executive, legislative, and judicial branches are all under the control of one person" one of those cases that Republicans love to use to justify the Second Amendment?
No.
Or at least, all the hostile-government related scenarios I've heard of were not dependent on whether or not any members of the federal government had been thrown into an oubliette, just on what things were being done on a local level.
Also, has no one ever voted against a sitting president of their party before? Yeah, a sitting president has an advantage here, but it doesn't mean they've all been replaced with Trump-bots.
-Morgan.
And let's see who the new Attorney General is going to be: Chris Christie or Rudy Guiliani? Because either one means "Welcome to the 1950's"
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell