RE: A serious post - What if someone were to discover handwavium, and what if it is me
09-07-2017, 06:19 PM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2017, 06:56 PM by aether.)
09-07-2017, 06:19 PM (This post was last modified: 09-07-2017, 06:56 PM by aether.)
Firstly I have learnt a lot of conventional physics over that time, and before.
I actually know conventional electromagnetism very very well and probably in more depth than you do.
It is not related to Telsa, or even to electromagnetism.
And you are basically far far off on every point, the coil BTW does not need to be powered! While the initial test was, I knew I was on to something when the effect persisted for about 10 minutes after turning off the power.
I then found that no power source is needed with a simple adjustment.
I am not looking for someone else to do the work, I am actively experimenting, but there is a lot to do and I would like not to be the only one.
unsubstantiated extraordinary claims ("something revolutionary") CHECK! <FALSE, you can easily substantiate my claims if you try them. Others have done so.
unrecognized value at risk ("people who might have more interest in suppressing/stealing this technology") CHECK! <Your point being? Even if you are saying I am wrong about there being risk, there is unrecognized value.
brings up disproved hypotheses (aether, antigravity, free energy) CHECK! <Nothing has been disproven. I am not saying that what I have discovered is "aether" and aether was not disproven by Michelson Morley, also Enstein's cosmological constant is considered to be confirmed at this point and it is antigravity. Also antigravity is not a rigorous term.
admission of scientific illiteracy ("Antigravity and Free Energy, and I concluded that there really was something to it") CHECK! <Yes, energy anomalies can be produced. But the question is why all these baseless objections, it is like you are trying to protect yourself from extraordinary possibilities.
some mysticism (chi, orgone) CHECK! <Just trying to convey that there has been evidence for something else going on and it has been ignored.
unsubstantiated statistics ("over 90% of people can feel this energy") CHECK! <That is a valid criticism, but it is based on my personal experience. So it is indicative. If I don't have a peer reviewed cross correlated study by multiple well respected academic institutions should I simply mention nothing about the approximate frequency I have found people can feel the "energy" (for lack of a better term as it is not nessasarily energy as physics understands the term).
discredit known science with no proof ("able to verify that it was not anything conventional") CHECK! <What obvious energy or effect should come from a cold (room temp) unenergized coil?
misused scientific terms/Treknobabble ("a sub quantum field") CHECK! < Not misused, merely a suggestion that what I am creating/effecting is real stuff that is not at a whole quanta, there is evidence for fractional electric charge for instance, I think that this is what it might be. But I do not know. It is at this time an unknown. It is just that there is "SOMETHING" that comes from correctly designed coils.
doesn't say anything about the actual "technology" ("a strange coil") CHECK! < Correct, but let me say something now. If you have magnet wire or insulated gardening wire, or any ideally malleable single core insulated wire, then you can make one of these coils at no cost . You could make some coils in about 6 seconds. But it seemed wrong to lead with the details of the technology. But if you want the details being a total ass working from the James Randi play book isn't the way to get it.
appeal to "visionaries" to do the heavy lifting ("anyone...willing to put in the work") CHECK! < Only visionaries like myself will do the heavy lifting.
failure to spell-check (shows sloppy work/inflated ego/paranoia) CHECK! < Well as long as you are keeping your criticisms relivant. I mean, if I misspell something or fail to use spell check fully then clearly my discovery is worthless.
Better to err on the side of throwing away a valuable discovery and take the chance of being a self righteous critic, it might not lead to advancing humanity to the stars, but it is easier and more enjoyable in the moment.
But hey, at least you are being true to yourself, "spoil sport" suggests a petty person with no vision.
I actually know conventional electromagnetism very very well and probably in more depth than you do.
It is not related to Telsa, or even to electromagnetism.
And you are basically far far off on every point, the coil BTW does not need to be powered! While the initial test was, I knew I was on to something when the effect persisted for about 10 minutes after turning off the power.
I then found that no power source is needed with a simple adjustment.
I am not looking for someone else to do the work, I am actively experimenting, but there is a lot to do and I would like not to be the only one.
unsubstantiated extraordinary claims ("something revolutionary") CHECK! <FALSE, you can easily substantiate my claims if you try them. Others have done so.
unrecognized value at risk ("people who might have more interest in suppressing/stealing this technology") CHECK! <Your point being? Even if you are saying I am wrong about there being risk, there is unrecognized value.
brings up disproved hypotheses (aether, antigravity, free energy) CHECK! <Nothing has been disproven. I am not saying that what I have discovered is "aether" and aether was not disproven by Michelson Morley, also Enstein's cosmological constant is considered to be confirmed at this point and it is antigravity. Also antigravity is not a rigorous term.
admission of scientific illiteracy ("Antigravity and Free Energy, and I concluded that there really was something to it") CHECK! <Yes, energy anomalies can be produced. But the question is why all these baseless objections, it is like you are trying to protect yourself from extraordinary possibilities.
some mysticism (chi, orgone) CHECK! <Just trying to convey that there has been evidence for something else going on and it has been ignored.
unsubstantiated statistics ("over 90% of people can feel this energy") CHECK! <That is a valid criticism, but it is based on my personal experience. So it is indicative. If I don't have a peer reviewed cross correlated study by multiple well respected academic institutions should I simply mention nothing about the approximate frequency I have found people can feel the "energy" (for lack of a better term as it is not nessasarily energy as physics understands the term).
discredit known science with no proof ("able to verify that it was not anything conventional") CHECK! <What obvious energy or effect should come from a cold (room temp) unenergized coil?
misused scientific terms/Treknobabble ("a sub quantum field") CHECK! < Not misused, merely a suggestion that what I am creating/effecting is real stuff that is not at a whole quanta, there is evidence for fractional electric charge for instance, I think that this is what it might be. But I do not know. It is at this time an unknown. It is just that there is "SOMETHING" that comes from correctly designed coils.
doesn't say anything about the actual "technology" ("a strange coil") CHECK! < Correct, but let me say something now. If you have magnet wire or insulated gardening wire, or any ideally malleable single core insulated wire, then you can make one of these coils at no cost . You could make some coils in about 6 seconds. But it seemed wrong to lead with the details of the technology. But if you want the details being a total ass working from the James Randi play book isn't the way to get it.
appeal to "visionaries" to do the heavy lifting ("anyone...willing to put in the work") CHECK! < Only visionaries like myself will do the heavy lifting.
failure to spell-check (shows sloppy work/inflated ego/paranoia) CHECK! < Well as long as you are keeping your criticisms relivant. I mean, if I misspell something or fail to use spell check fully then clearly my discovery is worthless.
Better to err on the side of throwing away a valuable discovery and take the chance of being a self righteous critic, it might not lead to advancing humanity to the stars, but it is easier and more enjoyable in the moment.
But hey, at least you are being true to yourself, "spoil sport" suggests a petty person with no vision.