1) In terms of coverage vs. redundancy, Yekaterinenburg works better for me. Thanks!
2) Glad to hear it.
Still, I'm not feeling a need to go that far. It happens that setting the rounding-up point at 22.5 million would give Canada and Australia each the second IST their sizes demand of me (I'm thinking Regina and Perth), while having Oz' population as the minimum. On the other hand, it'll mean some recalculation to cover the countries with populations between Canada and Australia.
2) Glad to hear it.
Still, I'm not feeling a need to go that far. It happens that setting the rounding-up point at 22.5 million would give Canada and Australia each the second IST their sizes demand of me (I'm thinking Regina and Perth), while having Oz' population as the minimum. On the other hand, it'll mean some recalculation to cover the countries with populations between Canada and Australia.