Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility
Re: Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility
#15
I used the term "hackjob" because that's what it is; it's the result of hacking up the original script. Whether that alteration improved it, destroyed it or just made it different is open to debate, but that it was hacked up is fairly unquestionable (much as I hate to use that term).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by The Wanderer - 02-20-2004, 09:42 AM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by The Wanderer - 02-20-2004, 09:50 PM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by Herr Bad Moon - 02-26-2004, 06:11 AM
Re: Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by The Wanderer - 02-27-2004, 08:00 AM
Re: Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by The Wanderer - 02-27-2004, 09:01 AM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by WengFook - 02-27-2004, 10:06 PM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by Skitz Warriors Alpha - 02-27-2004, 11:06 PM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by The Wanderer - 02-29-2004, 03:14 AM
Firefly - by Logan Darklighter - 02-29-2004, 03:35 AM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by Kokuten - 03-01-2004, 04:44 AM
Beast Wars - by Guest - 03-01-2004, 08:12 PM
Re: Beast Wars - by mephron - 03-01-2004, 09:40 PM
Re: Reviving an old put-on-hold Step possibility - by Skitz Warriors Alpha - 03-01-2004, 10:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)