Drunkard's Walk Forums › The Drunkard's Walk › General DW Chatter v
DW Ontology

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
DW Ontology
robkelk Offline
Untitled
*****
Posts: 25,672
Threads: 2,064
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 12
Re: funnily enough
#14
10-23-2006, 02:48 PM
Quote:
...so, metaphysically, Ranma is... Ryoko?
Which would make Ryouga ... Aeka? (whimper)
Quote:
Well, it's not like Ryouga could be anyone but Nagi, is it?
Oh, that's much better.
However... would that mean Tatewaki and Kodachi Kuno are Mihoshi and Kiyone?

-Rob Kelk
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DW Ontology - by Murmur the Fallen - 10-04-2006, 08:01 AM
Re: DW Ontology - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 10-04-2006, 08:23 AM
Re: DW Ontology - by Bob Schroeck - 10-04-2006, 01:53 PM
Re: DW Ontology - by jpub - 10-13-2006, 07:48 PM
Re: DW Ontology - by Kokuten - 10-13-2006, 10:21 PM
buh? - by Murmur the Fallen - 10-22-2006, 11:01 AM
Re: buh? - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 10-22-2006, 05:22 PM
Re: buh? - by robkelk - 10-22-2006, 06:48 PM
Re: buh? - by Bob Schroeck - 10-23-2006, 02:30 AM
funnily enough - by Murmur the Fallen - 10-23-2006, 03:21 AM
Re: funnily enough - by Valles - 10-23-2006, 03:27 AM
Re: funnily enough - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 10-23-2006, 06:24 AM
Re: funnily enough - by Bob Schroeck - 10-23-2006, 02:13 PM
Re: funnily enough - by robkelk - 10-23-2006, 02:48 PM
This disturbs me, but... - by ECSNorway - 11-12-2006, 09:47 PM
Re: This disturbs me, but... - by Bob Schroeck - 11-13-2006, 06:44 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)