Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Boy tells Gardai to get a warrant. They do. Or why it's a good idea to stop the wild house party when the cops ask nice
Boy tells Gardai to get a warrant. They do. Or why it's a good idea to stop the wild house party when the cops ask nice
#1
To cut a long story short, a house party escalates until the police are called at 7:30 in the morning. The cops ask for the party to stop and the kid running it gives them lip. So an hour later they arrest the whole lot, and prosecute the kid for allowing people to smoke drugs in the home...

And if he'd just shut the party down... he'd never have even seen a judge.
http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/co ... 23285.html

Quote: Gardai searched 68 people and made four arrests in a drugs bust at an out of control house party in south Dublin that has been described as "every parent's nightmare".

The owners' son, Chris Bent, refused to stop the post-Leaving Certificate bash despite complaints and ordered gardai off his property unless they had a warrant. The officers returned 90 minutes later with one and raided the house.

The 20-year-old was prosecuted for permitting his family home to be used for drug offences.


Dublin District Court heard his parents had been away on holiday and told him he could "have a few friends over" but word got around that he had a free house and things got "totally out of hand".

His father Eugene Bent -- the communications and retention director at Dublin Chamber of Commerce -- attended the hearing last week.

When asked if he wished to comment on his son's case, Mr Bent told the Herald: "I don't want to say anything about it."

His son, who is now a film student, pleaded guilty to three counts of permitting the possession and smoking of cannabis as the occupant of the house, and permitting the sale, supply or distribution of dimethoxybromophenethylanine.

The offences happened at Kenilworth Square, Rathgar, on July 28 last year.

Judge Michael Walsh adjourned sentencing in the case for nine months.

He noted that Chris Bent was not accused of taking or supplying any drugs himself. He said he would be lenient if he undertook some voluntary work as a token of his remorse.

Sergeant Zita Woods said gardai were called to the house at 7.30am following complaints from neighbours that the party had "got out of hand", with bottles being thrown around.

Officers saw men smoking what they suspected to be cannabis and asked to speak to the person in charge.

The accused came out and the gardai asked him to stop the party.

"He demanded that the gardai get off his property without a warrant," Sgt Woods said.

The gardai returned at 9am with a warrant under the Misuse of Drugs Act and entered the house. A total of 68 people were searched, as well as a room in which cannabis had been smoked.

Several empty bags that had contained drugs were recovered and four people were found in possession of controlled substances and arrested.

Bent was detained and admitted knowing people were taking drugs in his house. However, he told gardai he thought it was only in the one room and that only cannabis was involved.

He was also not involved in selling or supplying drugs to anyone.

Bent had just finished his Leaving Certificate and his parents were away on holiday at the time, his barrister Kate McCormack said.

"Word spread that there was a free house and things got completely out of hand," Ms McCormack said.

Ms McCormack said: "The facts read like every parent's nightmare, and he is suitably ashamed of treating the family home in that way."

Bent's own behaviour had been appalling and the fact that he had been drinking was no excuse, she said.

As well as film studies, the accused was involved in music and composed his own tracks.

His barrister said a drugs conviction could have a major impact on his life and career and "every window of opportunity could be firmly shut" in terms of travel.

Judge Walsh adjourned the case to a date in December.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Reply
 
#2
What a moron. *sigh*
Reply
 
#3
Even a grad party *with the parents present* can get out of hand quickly. My brother had to act the bouncer at his step-son's due to a belligerent crasher who'd been cycling the local grad parties, especially the ones where alcohol was available.

Fight escalated far enough punches were thrown, but it was almost pitiful how one-sided the fight was.
''We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat
them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.''

-- James Nicoll
Reply
 
#4
Moral of the story: Don't piss off the law-enforcement agents, because they will enforce the law when they're pissed off.
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Reply
 
#5
"...I did not think this through."
Reply
 
#6
Reminds me of a much lower level "fight" between someone and the traffic authorities out here.

I have friends who live in a townhouse (think owned two-story flat). Most of the parking lot and garage access is communal, except for about 4-8 units that have a little junction just a little before you'd make a right turn into the main complex. This little junction doesn't have a lot of provision for outdoor parking really.

Well, one person, living in one of the units, rather than dealing with the extra walk entailed by parking in the main lot (I presume schedules conflicted enough that parking on the pad in front of the garage was NOT an option), would park on the street, between the entrance to the little junction and the main parking lot entrance.

This little spot between the junction and the main lot is maybe four car lengths total. On a one lane each way street. Right near one of the main drags. With no change in curb from the main intersection to where you'd make the actual right turn, basically if you turned, intended to go into the main complex, were used to there being no car there at all and not paying attention or eyes into the sun in the evening, you'd be at least banging corners really hard.

You can see where this might become something of a safety issue.

After some complaints, the city installed some "NO PARKING" signs along that little stretch. Predictably, the signs disappeared shortly after installation and the vehicle resumed parking along that bit. This happened something like two more times before the city upped the ante.

The city PAINTED IN A RIGHT TURN ONLY LANE at this point, because removing those painted lines would be a hell of a lot harder than cutting down the signs. Curved arrow, white line, the whole nine yards. Last I had heard, the vehicle effectively disappeared shortly after the vehicle's rather inconsiderate owner was seen arguing with a cop because he'd parked there again, I presume having attempted to position his vehicle to cover the arrow when doing so.

So yes, probably not the best idea to go against the authorities, especially when you are actually in the wrong, even if it's not "letter of the law" sorts of wrong (after all, until he started regularly parking there, they didn't have an actual reason to be more specific about that little stretch of road). They WILL make you eat that crow.
--

"You know how parents tell you everything's going to fine, but you know they're lying to make you feel better? Everything's going to be fine." - The Doctor
Reply
 
#7
I fear that someone has been watching too many police dramas and equating them to the Really, Real World. It makes a certain amount of sense that young Mr. Bent is a film student. Too bad no one told him that versimilitude does not equate reality.
Ebony the Black Dragon
http://ebony14.livejournal.com

"Good night, and may the Good Lord take a Viking to you."
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)