Posts: 2,564
	Threads: 324
	Joined: Mar 2004
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		Oh, definitely copyright infringement. I wonder how ole'Rush is going to explain this one?
__________________
Into terror!,  Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
		He'll probably claim it's fair use--that's what political propagandists generally do when copying other people's work. During the last presidential campaign there was a very widely distributed poster for the Obamessiah Hopenchange that led to the AP suing the guy who created the poster for copying an AP photo. He claimed fair use, and ended up settling out of court.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,072
	Threads: 62
	Joined: May 2006
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		... The possibility that the guy whose name is on the image is responsible never occurred to you?
-Morgan.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,441
	Threads: 118
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
Reputation: 
1
	 
	
	
		Given that the article includes a quote from the artist commenting on his work being copied? No.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,072
	Threads: 62
	Joined: May 2006
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		I was referring to Hiers, not Reynolds.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
		It depends on whether he did it as a work for hire or not--if he did, it's on the newletter's publisher. If not, it's on Hiers alone.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 8,933
	Threads: 386
	Joined: May 2006
	
Reputation: 
3
	 
	
	
		At the very least I'd say he deserves to be lampooned by the entire gaming community.
	
	
	
	
		
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 28,138
	Threads: 2,301
	Joined: Sep 2002
	
Reputation: 
21
	 
	
	
		In my defense, I want to say that I meant it in the sense of "Rush Limbaugh, Inc.'s media machine rips of D&D", not "Rush Limbaugh personally traced that picture and then pasted his head on it before claiming it entirely as his own work."
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.