Posts: 4,894
Threads: 302
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
8
It's about bloody time.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Posts: 8,933
Threads: 386
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Okay, is it tinfoil hat time? Are the Chinese or the Russians really going to be able to dictate that sites in the US cannot be viewed by any Interent user? Because, funny enough, the damn page that link goes to won't load for me. :p
Posts: 1,576
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation:
0
The answer to that is: Cloudy, try again later. However, I'm certain that they'd love being able to declare TOR traffic verboten and to lock down their networks completely.
Posts: 3,719
Threads: 96
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
9
From what I've read, Commerce has instructed ICANN to come up with a replacement that is not dominated by nation states, but other stakeholders. The real meaning here is that little will fundamentally change -- the Internet has been mostly run by the Internet Society and users anyway. This is mainly a political move because of the NSA/Snowden stuff, but it's not like IANA was causing any of the issues related to that. If you put on a tinfoil hat, you'll mainly be doing it for the fashion statement.
-- ∇×V
Posts: 8,933
Threads: 386
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
That's a load off my mind. Helps that the site is now up and running. :p