Speaking for myself - comments in the same order:
Agreed that the first three are of use.
Page ratings and image ratings should wait until we decide on criteria. What makes a "good" page or image, and what makes one resource "better" than another? The we can determine whether the extensions support our criteria. There's no point in implementing software that might not do what we want done.
Polls are nice, as long as they aren't straitjackets.
Why would we want to mimic TV Tropes' TW format? I thought we were going our own way with our own look and feel.
I'd probably waste some time writing some quizzes...
Yes, an acknowledgment that somebody has contributed is a Good Thing (assuming the contribution isn't spam, of course).
Agreed that the first three are of use.
Page ratings and image ratings should wait until we decide on criteria. What makes a "good" page or image, and what makes one resource "better" than another? The we can determine whether the extensions support our criteria. There's no point in implementing software that might not do what we want done.
Polls are nice, as long as they aren't straitjackets.
Why would we want to mimic TV Tropes' TW format? I thought we were going our own way with our own look and feel.
I'd probably waste some time writing some quizzes...
Yes, an acknowledgment that somebody has contributed is a Good Thing (assuming the contribution isn't spam, of course).
--
Rob Kelk
Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown
Rob Kelk
Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown