All in all, it's just another post on the wall

[robkelk]

Here is the LAW
Title 10 US Code 284
...

As you quoted and I snipped, Title 10 US Code 284 specifically says:

(7) Construction of roads and fences and installation of lighting to block drug smuggling corridors across international boundaries of the United States.

It says nothing about building a wall.

and here is an article specifying WHY IT IS LEGAL

Let's quote from that very article:

Can § 284’s authorization to build a “fence” to “block drug smuggling corridors” really be used to build a wall across the entire southern border? Is the wall really a “military construction project” of the sort authorized by § 2808? Does the president’s declaration of national emergency really “require[] use of the armed forces” as required by § 2808?

Three major red flags. That sounds to me like the article is saying it isn't legal.

Rob, that article is in reference to the BUDGET, what Trump did was take monies that had already been budgeted but not SPENT and re-appropriate them to this project. BY LAW under both 10USC284 (above) and the national emergency act he is legally able to do this as i have pointed out before. Maybe it was in another thread, but considering you keep restarting new threads with the same old arguments is it any wonder why i think DIDN"T WE DO THIS ALREADY?

As long as you continue to not acknowledge what is being said to you, it will continue to be said to you. Not necessarily by me, though - you've shown in your conversations with Epsilon that you aren't interested in formal debate, and you've shown right here that you aren't interested in looking at facts (you've even used an article that undermines your position in an attempt to support your position).