All in all, it's just another post on the wall

[Labster]

(you've even used an article that undermines your position in an attempt to support your position).

If it's good enough for Jonah "This is actually central to my point" Goldberg, maybe Rajvik figures it's good enough for him. (I say "maybe" because I lack the telepathic powers he uses to deduce that anyone arguing from a position that isn't his wants bread lines, death panels, the thousand-year reign of the Antichrist One World Government-Worshipping Religion, and fluoride in children's ice cream. Or whatever irritable mental gesture he's making this week.)

Can you please keep it courteous in here?  You don't have to use Godwin-adjacent language just when someone disagrees with you repeatedly.  Simply say that anyone who argues for a massive border wall is not arguing rationally and is likely underinformed, and move on.  Like I've said before, he really believes this stuff so countertrolling is not going to make any progress whatsoever.