Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A first in US bureaucracy
RE: A first in US bureaucracy
#6
(02-16-2020, 09:50 PM)Rajvik Wrote: Add to this that the "Line Prosecutors" tried to pull a fast one by telling their superiors one thing while sending something COMPLETELY different to the judge in question, iit's at best a bad faith argument.

You sure about that? I've not heard the line prosecutors talk about what they told Barr, so right now it's one known political hack talking about the prosecutors deviating from standard procedure (following the sentencing guidelines) when the documentation pretty clearly states they followed it. It might even be that the line prosecutors wanted to levy heftier punishments as a result of Stone's clear contempt of the judicial system and that following the guidelines was them being lenient.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
A first in US bureaucracy - by robkelk - 02-16-2020, 07:55 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Labster - 02-16-2020, 09:31 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Rajvik - 02-16-2020, 09:50 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Labster - 02-16-2020, 11:05 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by hazard - 02-17-2020, 05:42 AM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Matrix Dragon - 02-16-2020, 10:15 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Star Ranger4 - 02-17-2020, 05:56 AM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by robkelk - 02-18-2020, 08:41 AM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Matrix Dragon - 02-17-2020, 10:05 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by hazard - 02-18-2020, 01:45 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Star Ranger4 - 02-18-2020, 05:07 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by classicdrogn - 02-18-2020, 11:09 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Matrix Dragon - 02-19-2020, 12:27 AM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Rajvik - 02-20-2020, 06:05 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by robkelk - 02-20-2020, 07:07 PM
RE: A first in US bureaucracy - by Matrix Dragon - 02-20-2020, 08:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)