Judge Vinson's arguments against buying health insurance appear to me to be equally valid arguments against paying income tax. (In fact, they may be more valid arguments against paying income tax, since the taxpayer - the purchaser of federal government services - has no choice in which federal government he'll pay for those services, while he does have a choice in health insurance providers.)
I want to see somebody apply these arguments in that manner...
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
I want to see somebody apply these arguments in that manner...
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012