ordnance11 Wrote:And no talk of amending the anti-immigration laws from Arizona to Georgia.
I've heard legal immigrants like those laws...
Quote:I've been hearing snippets of the convention speeaches on the radio. The GOP, IMO, is living up to the moniker "The Party of No".
And what exactly does that even mean? I bet nearly anything you could call a "no" (whichever party is saying it) is a "yes" phrased differently, and vice versa. It's all about where you are on what issues and what approach you find more appealing.
(Though we've got one local guy here who has probably accomplished more "no" than any party could claim... Never been able to figure that one out.)
Quote:And seeing the rules committee decide to shut down the Ron Paul delegates, add "The Party of Mean" to that description also.
As for this, can you try to look at it from the other end for the moment?
I happen to live in Iowa, where 22/28 delegates went for Paul. I've looked at the result maps, and I can find a line of argument for giving Paul about half of the delegates. (14-15) I can find one for him getting slightly less than that. (12-13). The only one I've come up with that's even close to giving 22 is "Consider every vote that's not for Romney is a vote for Paul".
Is is that horrible that people would be upset that their chosen representatives aren't actually representing them, and might want something done about that?
-Morgan.