Rajvik Wrote:What i was saying is that when you have a Lower house that disagrees with both the upper house and the Executive branch as a whole it can be a good thing, in fact that it is there as a check to ballance the power of the other two. Remove that check because it refuses to kow tow to the other two and you start down a slope to totalitarianism.A House that refuses to allow the Senate or the executive to do anything other than what a few people in the House want is just as much a tyranny.
Rajvik Wrote:Tell me how well it works in Canada and Britain when the people who can afford it are coming to the US to have their operations done and those that cant suffer until the next budgetary year allows the hospitals to actually afford to do things for them.As they say on Wikipedia, "Citation Needed".
I've asked for proof of this in the past, and never received any.
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012