Am I the only one who's noticed a distinct difference in tone between both sides of the law's supporters......
Either way.
Seems like modern capitalism is nothing more than finding ways to write more and more blank cheques for the private sector with taxpayer's money. Either directly through funneling billions in taxes and subsidies to private companies for rapidly disemproving services, or by drafting laws that make purchases mandatory, cause anti-competitive monopolies to form or just plain ignoring obvious graft and substandard equipment under the guise of being 'industry friendly'.
It's hard for it not to be an utter clusterfuck for everyone else when the primary aim is just to enrichen the people who pay your campaign donations.
No matter which 'law' wins... ultimately the true winner will be the insurance companies and hospitals. The only difference is who gets screwed over in their favour.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Either way.
Seems like modern capitalism is nothing more than finding ways to write more and more blank cheques for the private sector with taxpayer's money. Either directly through funneling billions in taxes and subsidies to private companies for rapidly disemproving services, or by drafting laws that make purchases mandatory, cause anti-competitive monopolies to form or just plain ignoring obvious graft and substandard equipment under the guise of being 'industry friendly'.
It's hard for it not to be an utter clusterfuck for everyone else when the primary aim is just to enrichen the people who pay your campaign donations.
No matter which 'law' wins... ultimately the true winner will be the insurance companies and hospitals. The only difference is who gets screwed over in their favour.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?